Custom Field Types
In addition to Built-in Field Types, you can also defined custom strongly-typed fields.
The values stored in custom fields will be serialized before storing to the database, and on read, deserealized back. Typically, the serialization format is JSON (so you can use PostgreSQL column types like jsonc
or json
), but you can also use other formats (like array of bigint
, array of varchar
or anything else).
JSON-Serialized Fields
Let's first consider the simplest and the most common case of custom field types, where a fied is stored as a jsonc
value in a PostgreSQL Ent table.
Imagine we want to add a new custom field actors
to topics
table, internally stored as a JSON:
CREATE TABLE topics(
id bigserial PRIMARY KEY,
...
actors: jsonc NOT NULL
);
You define a custom type by providing an object with 3 callbacks:
type Actors = {
editor_ids: string[];
// will add more fields later
};
const ActorsType = {
dbValueToJs(v: unknown): Actors {
// node-postgres already parses jsonc internally,
// so we don't need anything more here
return v;
},
stringify(obj: Actors): string {
return JSON.stringify(v);
},
parse(v: string): Actors {
return JSON.parse(v);
},
}
dbValueToJS(v)
: given a value from node-postgres row, converts it to a strongly typed TypeScript value. (Notice that node-postgres already does some conversions internally: e.g. an array field,v
returned by the engine is already an array of things, sodbValueToJs
for it will just do nothing.) The return type of this callback will automatically become the custom field's TypeScript type. Ent Framework will execute this callback every time you load an Ent from the database.stringify(obj)
: given a value of your custom type, converts it into a string representation compatible with PostgreSQL value. Ent Framework will run this callback every time you use the custom field in any query (e.g. insert/update/delete or even when selecting Ents).parse(str)
: this callback is the opposite ofstringify()
. Ent Framework doesn't call it (since it usesdbValueToJs
instead), but for convenience and completeness of the interface, it's still here.
Once the above 3 callbacks are defined, you can declare a field of custom type in your schema:
const schema = new PgSchema(
"topics",
{
...
actors: { type: ActorsType },
},
["slug"]
);
...
const topic = await EntTopic.insertReturning(vc, {
...,
actors: { editor_ids: ["42"] },
});
...
console.log(topic.actors.editor_ids);
...
await topic.updateChanged({
actors: { editor_ids: ["101"] },
});
Adding an Optional Property to Custom Type
When you have a custom type, you'll most likely want to modify it in the future.
The simplest possible modification is adding an optional property:
type Actors = {
editor_ids: string[];
viewer_ids?: string[]; // <-- added; optional
};
You don't need to change anything else:
Your existing rows in the database (without
viewer_ids
) will be readable by the new code, since the property is optional.When your code assigns a value to
viewer_ids
, it will also be written to the database, and it won't conflict with the old code that can still be running somewhere in the cluster.
Adding a Required Property to Custom Type
Optional propertied are good (and in fact they are the only "officially recommended" way of adding properties in serialization protocols like protobuf), but optionality adds a technical debt spaghetti everywhere in your code where you work with your new properties. A better variant would be to make the property required.
type Actors = {
editor_ids: string[];
viewer_ids: string[]; // <-- added; required
};
const ActorsType = {
dbValueToJs(v: /* a little lie */ Actors): Actors {
v.viewer_ids ??= []; // <-- added
return v;
},
stringify(obj: Actors): string {
return JSON.stringify(v);
},
parse(v: string): Actors {
return this.dbValueToJs(JSON.parse(v));
},
}
The only change you need to make in ActorsType
is to default-assign []
to viewer_ids
property. Notice that we lie to TypeScript here a little: v
argument of dbValueToJs(v)
is in fact of type Actors & { viewer_ids?: string[] }
, not of type Actors
. But for simplicity, it's acceptable.
Changing the Shape Significantly
See Custom Field Refactoring in Advanced section.
Last updated
Was this helpful?